A number on a package means nothing without the methodology behind it. If you're the kind of buyer who wants to see the actual data before trusting a nutrient claim, we built our Lab Results page for exactly that — the full report, number by number.
Quick answer: Our beef is independently tested by Edacious across fatty acid ratios, vitamins, minerals, and heavy metals. The two numbers most worth checking first: an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio of approximately 2:1, and a PUFA to SFA ratio of approximately 0.083:1 — both published in full, not summarized into a single marketing claim.

Start With the Omega-6 to Omega-3 Ratio
This is the single most useful comparison number in the whole report. Our lab testing shows our beef averaging approximately a 2:1 omega-6 to omega-3 ratio, compared to roughly 5:1 for typical grass-fed beef and roughly 15:1 for conventional grain-fed beef [1]. A lower number here means a fat profile weighted more toward the omega-3s tied to reduced inflammatory markers, and less toward the omega-6s that dominate a grain-heavy diet.
The Number Most Buyers Skip: PUFA to SFA
Omega ratios get the attention, but the PUFA to SFA ratio tells you something the omega number alone doesn't: how stable that fat is. Our beef tests at approximately 0.083:1, compared to roughly 0.15:1 for average grass-fed beef and 0.30:1 for average grain-fed beef [1]. Lower generally means more saturated, more oxidation-resistant fat — a detail most nutrition claims never mention because it doesn't fit neatly into a one-line marketing sentence.

Vitamins and Minerals: Read the Actual Values, Not Just the Claim
Our published data breaks down specific values for B2, B3, B6, and vitamin E, along with zinc, iron, phosphorus, and several other minerals, all measured directly rather than estimated from a generic beef nutrition database [1]. If a brand tells you their beef is "nutrient-dense" without a number attached, that's a claim. What we publish is a value.

Reading "Below LOQ" Correctly
Some results on our report show as "Below LOQ" — Limit of Quantification. That means the substance either wasn't present or was below the level the testing method can reliably measure, which is the standard, accurate way a lab reports a low or absent result [1]. It's worth knowing this term specifically, since it shows up on heavy metal results and isn't the same as "not tested."

Why We Publish the Full Report Instead of a Summary
Every farm in our network is vetted through our own Know Your Food Index before it joins us [2], and the beef that results from that vetting is what gets tested. The lab data is the direct output of that farm standard, which is why the full report is published rather than distilled into a single number.
Verification checklist
The Data Worth Checking First
Key metrics and what to compare them against when evaluating beef quality claims.
Key Takeaways
- Our beef is independently tested by Edacious, and the full report is published rather than distilled into a marketing summary
- Our omega-6:3 ratio (~2:1) and PUFA:SFA ratio (~0.083:1) are both better than typical grass-fed and conventional grain-fed benchmarks in the report
- "Below LOQ" on a lab report means below the reliable detection threshold, not "not tested" — worth knowing when reading any lab data, not just ours
- The lab data reflects the actual farm standard behind it — our Know Your Food Index vetting, not a separate marketing claim layered on top
Frequently Asked Questions
How does REP Provisions ensure the quality and nutrient density of their meats?
We commission independent lab testing through Edacious, covering fatty acid ratios, vitamins, minerals, and heavy metals, and publish the full results rather than a curated summary.
What is a PUFA to SFA ratio and why does it matter?
PUFA to SFA is the ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat in a food. A lower ratio generally indicates more stable, less oxidation-prone fat. Our beef tests at approximately 0.083:1, compared to roughly 0.15:1 for average grass-fed beef and 0.30:1 for average grain-fed beef.
What are the benefits of regenerative meat vs. conventional meat in terms of nutrition?
Our lab testing shows a favorable omega-6 to omega-3 ratio of approximately 2:1, a lower PUFA to SFA ratio than conventional beef, and measurable levels of B-vitamins, zinc, iron, and phosphorus, all independently confirmed rather than self-reported.
Where can I see REP Provisions' actual lab report?
The full report is published directly on our Lab Results page, available to view or download in its entirety rather than summarized into marketing claims.
Read the full report yourself on our Lab Results page, or put it to the test starting with our Grass-Fed Ground Beef.
References
- ↑ REP Provisions, Lab Test Results page — repprovisions.com/pages/regenerative-grass-fed-beef-lab-test-results-rep-provisions
- ↑ REP Provisions, Know Your Food Index page — repprovisions.com/pages/know-your-food-index
Comments (0)
There are no comments for this article. Be the first one to leave a message!